International alternative networks are non-commercial agencies that strive to improve the quality of media and information in their countries. They are not imperialist power structures that are internally controlled. Instead, they’re self-sufficient, noncommercial groups that want to bring marketing into the 21st Century. These initiatives began in the 1990s, and have grown to include various media, like online video tutorials. These networks unlike traditional mass media, aren’t centralized. Instead, they operate as a local-regional, and sometimes even nation-wide connections between individuals.
These groups promote their ideas by organizing video reform campaigns and democratizing information for the benefit of everyone. They also create new networks of interaction that can be used to facilitate local or regional, as well as global modifications to social modify movements. They vary in size, type and focus on certain features. WCNs are an alternative network that is composed of wifi-enabled devices. They communicate to send information from one node to the next.
Although these systems are not all-inclusive however they share a few common traits, including the desire to provide Internet proficiency where mainstream network deployments are either unavailable or not the preferred choice. This article focuses on the legal and economic hurdles that these alternative networks have to face as well as governance issues. It draws lessons from eight historical precedents. It provides a classification as well as the definitions for these networks. In doing so, it aims to expand the critical discussion about alternative media as a part of the communication infrastructure, taking into account the complexities and diverse nature of their activities.