A boardroom review allows the table to evaluate their performance in a comprehensive way. It assists tables to identify weaknesses in their leadership relationships and the culture they operate in as well as the facets of longevity. It also ensures that the members who pay for table membership are prepared to fulfill their duties.

This research area is in its early stages of development, and a number of difficulties remain. The current evidence-based evidence provides diverse results on the impact of dissent on boards and their boardroombook.com/5-effective-communication-skills-in-meetings/ performance. Some studies provide positive (Zona 2016,) curvilinear, non-significant or mixed results. Other studies find negative (Brown Buchholtz And Butts 2019, Heemskerk Heemskerk and Wats, Minichilli, et al. 2012) connections between dissent and the performance of a board’s tasks.

Additionally, the existing research is lacking a deeper understanding of the factors that influence the dynamics of disagreement. To enhance the contextualization of this governance issue, it’s important to create a more theoretically integrated approach. This might include the use of configuring approaches (Federo and Saz Carranza 2018; Schiell Lewellyn and Yan 2023) to help researchers better understand how board attributes, processes, and contexts connect to the need for and sufficient causality in governance phenomenon.

Finaly, some studies use an esoteric definition of discord, but don’t provide precise measurement methods. This means that these studies are prone to measurement errors. It is important to develop more reliable measurement techniques for dissent in future studies.